Meta CEO Zuckerberg testifies in court over social media addiction claims

Mark Zuckerberg testifies in LA court

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg appeared in a Los Angeles court to answer questions about accusations that his company's platforms harm young users. The landmark trial is examining the addictive features of social media.

The case is part of a major wave of legal and regulatory action against tech platforms. Governments are increasingly concerned these companies contribute to addictive behavior and mental health issues in children and teenagers.

Countries are restricting access for kids

In response to these concerns, several countries have begun imposing restrictions. Some have implemented age verification systems to limit young people's access.

Others have taken more drastic measures. At least one country has banned social media use for children under the age of 16 entirely.

This global trend highlights the growing pressure on companies like Meta, TikTok, and Snap to redesign their products for younger audiences.

The debate over responsibility

A central question in the trial is who bears responsibility for managing young users' screen time. The plaintiffs argue Meta deliberately designed addictive features that exploit children's psychology.

Meta has historically defended its practices, often pointing to parental controls and family oversight. This raises a critical debate about the roles of corporations versus families.

Key questions include:

• Should platforms be legally liable for user addiction?
• What design changes are required to protect minors?
• How effective are parental control tools?

Experts weigh in on safety and psychology

The broader discussion involves experts from online safety and psychology. Larry Magid, CEO of ConnectSafely.org, advises companies including Meta on safety issues.

Psychologist Donna Dawson, who focuses on personality and behavior, provides insight into how social media interactions affect developing minds. Their perspectives are crucial for understanding the complex impact of these platforms.

The trial's outcome could set a significant precedent, potentially forcing major changes in how social media companies operate. It represents a direct legal challenge to the core business models of engagement and growth.